Skip to main content
13 Jumada al-awwal 1448 AH Saturday, 24 October 2026
Easy Da'wah Platform

Read

Listen

Personal Quran

ٱقْرَأْ

Continue your Quran journey

Read, listen and reflect on the Book of Allah with translations and renowned reciters.

Open Quran

Browse Collections

Discover

Hadith of the Day

Authentic narrations, clearly referenced

Every hadith shows its collection, book, chapter and reference so you can verify the source.

Explore Hadith

Explore

Tools

Media

Explore Islam through knowledge, reflection and authentic sources

Browse articles, tools and media gathered in one calm, ad-free place.

Start exploring

Start Learning

For Visitors

For Teachers

Personalised

Learn Quran with a qualified teacher

Choose an approved Quran teacher and learn at your own pace. Everything else on the platform stays free.

Find a Teacher

Categories

Featured Stories

A guide to Islam

A collection of essential duas

Hajj, step by step

Islamic news & updates

Community announcements, educational updates and reminders, published and verified by our team.

View all news
Study the Quran

Tafsir

Scholarly commentary explaining a verse — its context, its meaning and how the scholars have understood it.

An-Nisa 4:35

Word by word

وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ شِقَاقَ بَيْنِهِمَا فَٱبْعَثُوا۟ حَكَمًا مِّنْ أَهْلِهِۦ وَحَكَمًا مِّنْ أَهْلِهَآ إِن يُرِيدَآ إِصْلَـٰحًا يُوَفِّقِ ٱللَّهُ بَيْنَهُمَآ ۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيمًا خَبِيرًا

And if you fear dissension between the two, send an arbitrator from his people and an arbitrator from her people. If they both desire reconciliation, Allāh will cause it between them. Indeed, Allāh is ever Knowing and Aware.

Ibn Kathir (Abridged)

Hafiz Ibn Kathir

Appointing Two Arbitrators When the Possibility of Estrangement Between Husband and Wife Occurs

Allah first mentioned the case of rebellion on the part of the wife. He then mentioned the case of estrangement and alienation between the two spouses. Allah said,وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ شِقَاقَ بَيْنِهِمَا فَابْعَثُواْ حَكَماً مِّنْ أَهْلِهِ وَحَكَماً مِّنْ أَهْلِهَآ(If you fear a breach between the two, appoint (two) arbitrators, one from his family). The Fuqaha' (scholars of Fiqh) say that when estrangement occurs between the husband and wife, the judge refers them to a trusted person who examines their case in order to stop any wrongs commited between them. If the matter continues or worsens, the judge sends a trustworthy person from the woman's family and a trustworthy person from the man's family to meet with them and examine their case to determine whether it is best for them to part or to remain together.

Allah gives preference to staying together, and this is why Allah said,إِن يُرِيدَآ إِصْلَـحاً يُوَفِّقِ اللَّهُ بَيْنَهُمَآ(if they both wish for peace, Allah will cause their reconciliation.) `Ali bin Abi Talhah reported that Ibn `Abbas said, "Allah commands that a righteous man from the husband's side of the family and the wife's side of the family are appointed, so that they find out who among the spouses is in the wrong. If the man is in the wrong, they prevent him from his wife, and he pays some restitution. If the wife is in the wrong, she remains with her husband, and he does not pay any restitution. If the arbitrators decide that the marriage should remain intact or be dissolved, then their decision is upheld. If they decide that the marriage remains intact, but one of the spouses disagrees while the other agrees, and one of them dies, then the one who agreed inherits from the other, while the spouse who did not agree does not inherit from the spouse who agreed." This was collected by Ibn Abi Hatim and Ibn Jarir.

Shaykh Abu `Umar bin `Abdul-Barr said, "The scholars agree that when the two arbitrators disagree, then the opinion that dissolves the marriage will not be adopted. They also agree that the decision of the arbitrators is binding, even if the two spouses did not appoint them as agents. This is the case if it is decided that they should stay together, but they disagree whether it is binding or not when they decide for separation." Then he mentioned that the majority holds the view that the decision is still binding, even if they did not appoint them to make any decision.

Ma'arif al-Qur'an

Mufti Muhammad Shafi

It is to block the road to this terrible discord that, in the second verse, the Holy Qur'an addresses government authorities of the time, the guardians of the parties concerned and their supporters, and the general body of Muslims, and suggests a decent method which would cool down tempers, shut out avenues of accusations and make a compromise between the affected parties possible, so that the dispute which, no doubt, could not remain restricted to the couple's home, would at least be settled within their families and not go to a court of law to become public knowledge.

This particular method requires that concerned officials of the government or the guardians of the parties or a body of Muslims which has the necessary integrity, influence and authority should take charge and appoint two arbitrators to hep bring about a compromise between the parties concerned - taking one arbitrator from the man's family and the other from that of the woman. At both these places, the Holy Qur'an has used the word, "hakam" for these appointees whereby it pin-points the necessary qualifications of these two persons, that is, they should have the capability to decide the dispute between the two. parties; and this capability, as obvious, will be found in a person who is both knowledgeable and trustworthy.

In short, the rule that emerges from here is that a "hakam" or arbitrator from the man's family and another from that of the woman should be appointed and sent to the husband and wife. Now, as for what they are going to do when they meet them and as to what rights they have in this matter - this the Holy Qur'an does not determine. However, it does add a remark at the end: إِن يُرِ‌يدَا إِصْلَاحًا يُوَفِّقِ اللَّـهُ بَيْنَهُمَا which means: If these two arbitrators desire to set things right, Allah Almighty will help them bring about harmony between the husband and the wife. So, two things emerge from this sentence:1. If both arbitrators have good intentions and genuinely wish to bring about peace between the dissenting couple, there will be unseen help from Allah Almighty and they shall succeed in their mission, and it will be through their efforts that Allah Almighty will create love and harmony in the hearts of the couple.

This leads to the conclusion that, in cases where mutual rapport is not restored, it may be because one of the arbitrators lacks perfect sincerity while pursuing the goal of peace-making.2. The purpose of appointing these two arbitrators, as also under-stood from this sentence, is to bring about peace and amity between the husband and the wife and does not include anything beyond that. However, it would be something else if the parties affected by the mutual dispute agree to appoint these two arbitrators as their repre-sentatives and their attorneys in all respects in which case they would be admitting that any decision given by the two arbitrators jointly will be acceptable to and binding on both of them. Under this situation, the two arbitrators shall have absolute authority to decide their case. If both agree on divorce as the solution, they can effect a divorce. If they both decide that the women should be released under khul , a form of dissolution of marriage, the khul' shall come into effect, and their decision shall be binding on the parties.

From among the pious elders, this is the position held by Hasan al-Basri and Imam Abu Hanifah. (Ruh ai-Ma ani, etc.)Cited in this connection is an incident which occurred in the presence of Sayyidna ` Ali ؓ . There too, one finds the proof that the two arbitrators referred to above do not have any intrinsic right other than that of making peace between the husband and wife - unless, of course, the parties concerned authorize them fully to decide as they deem fit. This incident, as narrated by ` Ubaidah al-Salmani, appears in the Sunnan of al-Baihaqi and is being reported below.

A man and a woman came to Sayyidna ` Ali کَرَّمَ اللہ وجھہ along with groups of people accompanying both. Sayyidna ` Ali کَرَّمَ اللہ وجھہ asked them to appoint an arbitrator, one from the man's family and another from the woman's. When arbitrators were appointed, he addressed them both: 'Do you know your responsibility? Do you know what you have to do? Hear me. If both of you agree to keep the husband and wife together and make peace between them, then do it. And if you come to the conclusion that matters cannot be set right between them or that they will not stay right later on, and both of you concur with the option that a separation between them is the expedient course, then do it.' When the woman heard this, she said: 'I accept this. Let these two arbitrators act in accordance with Divine law and I shall accept any decision they give whether it meets my wishes or goes against.' But, the husband said: 'Separation and divorce are things I am not going to accept under any condition.

However, I authorize the arbitrators to ask me to pay whatever financial penalty they impose and let my wife return to me in peace.' Sayyidna ALI کَرَّمَ اللہ وجھہ said: 'No. You too should authorize the arbitrators in the same manner as was done by the woman.'From this incident, some mujtahid Imams deduced the principle that these arbitrators have an inherent authority to divorce as was done by Sayyidna ` Ali کَرَّمَ اللہ وجھہ who asked the parties concerned to do that, while the great Imam Abu Hanifah and Hasan al-Basri رحمۃ اللہ علیہما have taken the position that, had it been an inherent power of the arbitrators to divorce there was no need for Sayyidna ` Ali کَرَّمَ اللہ وجھہ to obtain the authorization from the parties concerned. Here, the very effort to seek the agreement of the parties is a proof of the fact that these arbitrators do not have such an inherent power. Nevertheless, they do become authorized if the husband and wife delegate the necessary authority to them.

This teaching of the Holy Qur'an opens a new outlet of resolving mutual disputes, something which saves people from the botheration of going to courts and government officials and gives them an opportunity to iron out a good deal of their disputes and claims through family-oriented arbitration.

Arbitration in other disputes as well

Muslim jurists say that the appointment of two arbitrators to make peace between two parties in dispute, is not limited to the disputes between a husband and a wife. It can be profitably used in other areas of discord. In fact, it should be so used, specially when the parties involved are related to each other, because a court decision is a short-term solution of the basic problem. at happens after is that such decisions leave the germs of hatred and hostility in the hearts of those affected and which reapear after a passage of time in forms that are much too unpleasant. Sayyidna ` Umar, may Allah be pleased with him, had promulgated an order for his judges which said:رُدُّوا القضاءَ بَین ذَوِی الاَرحَامِ حَتَّی یصطَلِحُوا فَاِنَّ فصلَ القَضَاءِ یُورِثُ الضَّغَأینَ (معین الحکام، ص 214)"Send disputes between relatives back to them so that they make peace with the help of each other, as a court decision breeds heart burnings and hostility.

Although this Faruqi directive concerns disputes rising in between relatives, yet, the reason given in this directive (that is, court decisions tend to create hatred and hostility in hearts) is a reason which covers not only the relatives but non-relatives as well. Wisdom lies in saving all Muslims from mutual hatred and hostility. Therefore, the Muslim jurists are of the view that it is appropriate for officials and judges that they, before hearing the cases formally, should make an. effort to find a way out whereby the disputing parties get together and agree on mutual conciliation. (See al-Tarablusi, Mu` in al-hukkam p.214 and also Ibn al-Shahnah: Lisn al-hukkam).

Though brief, yet these two verses present a comprehensive system of family life which, if put into practice, could help eliminate a lot of disputes, hatreds and hostilities from the world. Men and women would live in peace among their families, secure against all those local dissensions which turn into all sorts of tribal, racial, national, even, international feuds.

In the end, let us recapitulate the great Qur'anic mechanism of how to quash family feuds - a virtual gift to the whole world:1. Resolve family disputes within the house using one method after the other.2. When this is not possible, government officials or the kinsfolk make peace between the disputing parties through two arbitrators, so that, the dispute does not go out of the larger family circle, even if it goes out of the house itself.3. When this too is not possible and the matter goes to the court finally, it is the duty of the judicial authority to investigate into the case background of both parties and come up with a decision which is just.

It may be noted that by saying إِنَّ اللَّـهَ كَانَ عَلِيمًا خَبِيرً‌ا (Surely, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Aware) warning has been given to the two arbitrators as well to the effect that they should keep in mind that no injustice or crookedness from them will go unnoticed for they shall be appearing before the Being who knows all and is aware of everything.

Tafsir Muyassar

Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Saudi Arabia

وإن علمتم -يا أولياء الزوجين- شقاقًا بينهما يؤدي إلى الفراق، فأرسلوا إليهما حكمًا عدلا من أهل الزوج، وحكمًا عدلا من أهل الزوجة; لينظرا ويحكما بما فيه المصلحة لهما، وبسبب رغبة الحكمين في الإصلاح، واستعمالهما الأسلوب الطيب يوفق الله بين الزوجين. إن الله تعالى عليم، لا يخفى عليه شيء من أمر عباده، خبير بما تنطوي عليه نفوسهم.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir

Hafiz Ibn Kathir

ذكر [ تعالى ] الحال الأول ، وهو إذا كان النفور والنشوز من الزوجة ، ثم ذكر الحال الثاني وهو : إذا كان النفور من الزوجين فقال تعالى : ( وإن خفتم شقاق بينهما فابعثوا حكما من أهله وحكما من أهلها )قال الفقهاء : إذا وقع الشقاق بين الزوجين ، أسكنهما الحاكم إلى جنب ثقة ، ينظر في أمرهما ، ويمنع الظالم منهما من الظلم ، فإن تفاقم أمرهما وطالت خصومتهما ، بعث الحاكم ثقة من أهل المرأة ، وثقة من قوم الرجل ، ليجتمعا وينظرا في أمرهما ، ويفعلا ما فيه المصلحة مما يريانه من التفريق أو التوفيق ، وتشوف الشارع إلى التوفيق; ولهذا قال : ( إن يريدا إصلاحا يوفق الله بينهما )وقال علي بن أبي طلحة ، عن ابن عباس : أمر الله عز وجل ، أن يبعثوا رجلا صالحا من أهل الرجل ، ورجلا مثله من أهل المرأة ، فينظران أيهما المسيء ، فإن كان الرجل هو المسيء ، حجبوا عنه امرأته وقصروه على النفقة ، وإن كانت المرأة هي المسيئة ، قصروها على زوجها ومنعوها النفقة . فإن اجتمع رأيهما على أن يفرقا أو يجمعا ، فأمرهما جائز . فإن رأيا أن يجمعا ، فرضي أحد الزوجين وكره ذلك الآخر ، ثم مات أحدهما ، فإن الذي رضي يرث الذي كره ولا يرث الكاره الراضي .

رواه ابن أبي حاتم وابن جرير .وقال عبد الرزاق : أخبرنا معمر ، عن ابن طاوس ، عن عكرمة بن خالد ، عن ابن عباس قال : بعثت أنا ومعاوية حكمين ، قال معمر : بلغني أن عثمان بعثهما ، وقال لهما : إن رأيتما أن تجمعا جمعتما ، وإن رأيتما أن تفرقا فرقتما .وقال : أنبأنا ابن جريج ، حدثني ابن أبي مليكة ، أن عقيل بن أبي طالب تزوج فاطمة بنت عتبة بن ربيعة فقالت : تصير إلي وأنفق عليك . فكان إذا دخل عليها قالت : أين عتبة بن ربيعة وشيبة بن ربيعة ؟ قال : على يسارك في النار إذا دخلت . فشدت عليها ثيابها فجاءت عثمان ، فذكرت له ذلك فضحك وأرسل ابن عباس ومعاوية ، فقال ابن عباس : لأفرقن بينهما . فقال معاوية : ما كنت لأفرق بين شيخين من بني عبد مناف . فأتياهما فوجداهما قد أغلقا عليهما أبوابهما فرجعا .وقال عبد الرزاق : أخبرنا معمر ، عن أيوب ، عن محمد بن سيرين ، عن عبيدة قال : شهدت عليا وجاءته امرأة وزوجها ، مع كل واحد منهما فئام من الناس ، فأخرج هؤلاء حكما وهؤلاء حكما ، فقال علي للحكمين : أتدريان ما عليكما ؟ إن عليكما إن رأيتما أن تجمعا ، جمعتما . فقالت المرأة : رضيت بكتاب الله لي وعلي . وقال الزوج : أما الفرقة فلا .

فقال علي : كذبت ، والله لا تبرح حتى ترضى بكتاب الله ، عز وجل ، لك وعليك .رواه ابن أبي حاتم ، ورواه ابن جرير ، عن يعقوب ، عن ابن علية ، عن أيوب ، عن ابن سيرين ، عن عبيدة ، عن علي ، مثله . ورواه من وجه آخر ، عن ابن سيرين ، عن عبيدة ، عن علي ، به .وهذا مذهب جمهور العلماء : أن الحكمين إليهما الجمع والتفرقة ، حتى قال إبراهيم النخعي : إن شاء الحكمان أن يفرقا بينهما بطلقة أو بطلقتين أو ثلاث فعلا . وهو رواية عن مالك .وقال الحسن البصري : الحكمان يحكمان في الجمع ولا يحكمان في التفريق ، وكذا قال قتادة ، وزيد بن أسلم . وبه قال أحمد بن حنبل ، وأبو ثور ، وداود ، ومأخذهم قوله تعالى : ( إن يريدا إصلاحا يوفق الله بينهما ) ولم يذكر التفريق .وأما إذا كانا وكيلين من جهة الزوجين ، فإنه ينفذ حكمهما في الجمع والتفرقة بلا خلاف .وقد اختلف الأئمة في الحكمين : هل هما منصوبان من عند الحاكم ، فيحكمان وإن لم يرض الزوجان ، أو هما وكيلان من جهة الزوجين ؟

على قولين : فالجمهور على الأول; لقوله تعالى : ( فابعثوا حكما من أهله وحكما من أهلها ) فسماهما حكمين ، ومن شأن الحكم أن يحكم بغير رضا المحكوم عليه ، وهذا ظاهر الآية ، والجديد من مذهب الشافعي ، وهو قول أبي حنيفة وأصحابه .الثاني منهما ، بقول علي ، رضي الله عنه ، للزوج - حين قال : أما الفرقة فلا - قال : كذبت ، حتى تقر بما أقرت به ، قالوا : فلو كانا حاكمين لما افتقر إلى إقرار الزوج ، والله أعلم .قال الشيخ أبو عمر بن عبد البر : وأجمع العلماء على أن الحكمين - إذا اختلف قولهما - فلا عبرة بقول الآخر ، وأجمعوا على أن قولهما نافذ في الجمع وإن لم يوكلهما الزوجان ، واختلفوا : هل ينفذ قولهما في التفرقة ؟ ثم حكي عن الجمهور أنه ينفذ قولهما فيها أيضا .

Tafsir is provided for educational reference. Paragraph breaks are added for readability — the wording of each commentary is unchanged. For religious guidance, consult a qualified scholar.